The global “take-make-waste” economy is driving unsustainable resource use, contributing to 90% of biodiversity loss and water stress. With global waste projected to soar to 3.4 billion metric tons by 2050, we are consuming resources 1.75 times faster than Earth can regenerate. Waste management companies have a vital role to play in reversing this trend by promoting prevention, reduction, recycling, and circular economy practices. By transforming operations and value chains, the sector can help reduce pressure on nature and contribute to the Global Biodiversity Framework’s goal to halt and reverse nature loss by 2030 through more sustainable resource and waste systems.

Read the Ringkasan here

The agri-food system, which spans from input supply to food disposal, sustains 2.5 billion livelihoods and feeds the global population. However, it heavily depends on—and simultaneously threatens—biodiversity and ecosystems. Agriculture is the leading driver of deforestation, biodiversity loss, and soil degradation, impacting 86% of species at risk of extinction. Despite these challenges, the sector holds immense potential to drive nature-positive change. To ensure food security, human health, and ecological balance, a rapid transformation in how food is produced, sourced, and consumed is critical. Sector-specific actions guide businesses in supporting the Global Biodiversity Framework’s mission to reverse nature loss by 2030.

Read the Ringkasan here

As demand rises, the cement and concrete sector must act now to align with nature-positive and net-zero goals. While some companies already operate under strict regulations and industry-led sustainability efforts like those by the Global Cement and Concrete Association, the sector still contributes to nature loss through emissions, water use, and quarrying. To support the Global Biodiversity Framework’s 2030 mission, sector-specific actions have been developed to guide companies in transforming their practices and reducing environmental impacts across the value chain.

Read the Ringkasan here

The energy system, including oil, gas, and utilities, plays a critical role in both driving and addressing nature loss. It encompasses all aspects of energy production, conversion, storage, delivery, and use. With high greenhouse gas emissions and intensive land and water use, the sector significantly impacts nature and faces risks to business continuity. However, it also holds vast potential to support nature-positive outcomes, as energy is essential across industries and households. A guideline of Energy sector actions has been developed to align energy systems with the Global Biodiversity Framework’s 2030 mission to halt and reverse nature loss.

Read the Ringkasan here

Forest companies, managing around 30% of the world’s forests for wood production, are key players in achieving a nature-positive and net-zero future. Their operations rely heavily on healthy ecosystems, especially for long-term wood fiber supply. However, long harvest cycles make them vulnerable to climate and nature-related risks. To address these challenges and meet rising demand sustainably, the forest sector must transition to an inclusive circular bioeconomy, using wood from responsibly managed forests. A new guidance report outlines sector actions needed to transform business practices and support the Global Biodiversity Framework’s 2030 goals.

Read the Ringkasan here

Embark on a journey towards sustainability with this comprehensive guide, crafted to support businesses in navigating the complexities of the TEEBAgriFood Evaluation Framework. With practical examples, insightful case studies, and a structured approach, this guide serves as a vital tool for businesses committed to shaping a more sustainable and equitable future for generations to come.

DOWNLOAD HERE

Being aware of the mentioned above problem, Indonesia Business Council for Sustainable Development (IBCSD) through an initiative called Tackling Marine Litter by Seizing Circularity Opportunities share this working document of businesses’ smart practices and concrete actions in handling plastic waste in the spirit of EPR and circular business models titled Closing the Loop in Plastic & Packaging – Best Practices from Businesses in Indonesia.

Download

According to the EPA, one of the six ways of reducing food loss and waste that companies can do is through the redistribution of food surplus, also known as a food donation. This activity connects companies, individuals, or donors who have excess product absorption in the market to do good things by distributing surplus products that are still feasible to surrounding communities in need.

In addition, Michael Jones, International Program Manager of WRAP UK in the food donation working group discussion, also shared his experiences while handling the FLW program in the UK. In the UK, WRAP has a Courtauld Commitment 2030, a UK success story – a voluntary agreement that enables collaborative action across the entire UK food chain to deliver farm-to-fork reductions in food waste, greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, and water stress that will help the UK food and drink sector achieve global environmental goals.

He mentioned that there are several key drivers that encourage companies to make food donations, such as cost, corporate social responsibility, beneficiaries, and ease of implementation. However, in practice, sometimes challenges arise regarding product recalls, product damage, close or past sell-by dates, quantity, product ownership, product ownership, safety, and traceability, brand integrity, safety, and traceability, and incorrect labels. To help other companies around the world, WRAP has documented how to overcome these challenges on its website.

The one-hour discussion was attended by representatives from Nutrifood, Superindo, Great Giant Foods, FoodBank of Indonesia (FOI), FoodCycle Indonesia, Aksata Pangan, FoodBank Bandung, Surplus Indonesia, and East-West Seed. 

Find out more in https://grasp2030.ibcsd.or.id/